Pethokoukis

Despite the taper, Bernanke Fed stays in pro-growth mode

Federal Reserve

Federal Reserve

If stock market’s initial mega-bullish reaction is any gauge, then the Bernanke Fed’s decision to, effectively, refrain from reducing monetary stimulus is good for US economic growth. And it probably is. Although the Federal Open Market Committee did announce it was reducing its monthly bond buys to $75 billion from $85 billion, at the same time policymakers also strengthened their commitment to keeping interest rates low for a long time.

The FOMC will now likely “maintain the current target range for the federal funds rate well past the time that the unemployment rate declines below 6-1/2 percent” if inflation remains quiescent. And a variety of labor market metrics will be used to determine when it is time to raise rates. In particular, Bernanke highlighted the high levels of long-term unemployment and underemployment.

As IHS Global Insight puts it, “In essence, [the Fed] maintained the existing threshold for higher rates, but suggested it will likely ignore it.” And Barclays:

Consequently, although the Fed did not reduce its unemployment rate threshold below 6.5% or provide an outright inflation floor, it came as close as it could by saying it “anticipates” that it will not seek to raise rates until it forecasts unemployment of around 6.0% and headline PCE inflation is in the range of 1.6-2.0% y/y.

Economist Scott Sumner, who would prefer the Fed target the level of nominal GDP, previously recommended the central bank drop the unemployment trigger as a way of making policy more expansionary. As such, he was heartened by today’s move:

Today’s decision did not drop the unemployment threshold, but it weakened it.  It should simply be removed.  If they promised to wait until expected inflation rose to 2.5% before raising rates, it would mean roughly 2% inflation over the next few years, as the inflation rate is now running below 2%. That’s still too tight, but much better than the old policy, and even better than today’s revision.  Unemployment should never have been made a part of the forward guidance.

Bernanke is certainly correct that a “highly accommodative monetary policy remains appropriate.” Inflation is still very low, unemployment high. While critics will argue that the 2013 economy isn’t much better than the 2012 version, Bernanke is also correct to point out that the Fed offset a “good bit” of fiscal austerity. We still have a pro-growth monetary policy, now it’s time for some pro-growth fiscal policy from the White House and Congress.

Follow James Pethokoukis on Twitter at @JimPethokoukis, and AEIdeas at @AEIdeas.

2 thoughts on “Despite the taper, Bernanke Fed stays in pro-growth mode

  1. Our economy is floating on borrowed and fabricated money, and on zero interest rates. The monetary stimulus has been in the range of $1.7 trillion for 5 years now, about 10% of GDP, a total of about $9 trillion so far. The free market has been anesthetized.

  2. Would have preferred to see the Fed explore “tapering up” until employment and higher inflation targets were hit, but a minor taper down is not the end of the world….

    meanwhile, supposedly the Brits are increasing employment by the US equivalent of 400k a month….so what are the Brits doing right?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>