Carpe Diem

Women earned majority of doctoral degrees in 2012 for 4th straight year, and outnumber men in grad school 141 to 100


grad2The Council of Graduate Schools (CGS) released its annual report recently on US graduate school enrollment and degrees for 2012, and here are some of the more interesting findings in this year’s report:

1. For the fourth year in a row, women in 2012 earned a majority of doctoral degrees. Of the 67,220 doctoral degrees awarded in 2012 at US universities, women earned 34,761 of those degrees and 52.2% of the total, compared to 31,830 degrees awarded to men who earned 47.8% of the total (see top chart above).  The 52.2% female share of doctoral degrees in 2012 decreased slightly from the 52.5% share in 2011, but was higher than the 51.9% female share in 2010 and the 50.4% female share in 2009, which was the first year ever that women outnumbered men earning doctoral degrees. Previously, women started earning a majority of associate’s degrees in 1978, master’s degrees in 1981, and bachelor’s degrees in 1982 according to the Department of Education. Therefore 2009 marked the year when men officially became the “second sex” in higher education by earning a minority of college degrees at all levels from associate’s degrees up to doctoral degrees.

2. By field of study, women earning doctoral degrees in 2012 outnumbered men in 7 of the 11 graduate fields tracked by the CGS (see top chart above): Arts and Humanities (53.6% female), Biology (52.4%, that is a STEM field), Education (67.6%), Health Sciences (70.8)%, Public Administration (56.4%), Social/Behavioral Studies (61.1%) and Other fields (53.6%).  Men still earned a majority of 2012 doctoral degrees in the fields of Business (56.8% male), Engineering (77.8%), Math and Computer Science (74.8%), and Physical Sciences (66.6%).

3. The middle chart above shows the gender breakdown for master’s degrees awarded in 2012, and the gender disparity in favor of females is significant – women earned just under 60% of all master’s degrees in 2012, which would also mean that women earned 146.9 master’s degrees last year for every 100 degrees earned by men.  Like for doctoral degrees, women outnumbered men in the same 7 out of the 11 fields of graduate study and in some of those fields the gender disparity was huge.  For example, women earned more than 418 master’s degrees in health sciences for every 100 men, and more than 300 master’s degrees in both education and public administration for every 100 men.

4. The bottom chart above displays total enrollment in 2012 by gender and field for all graduate school programs in the US (both master’s and doctoral levels), showing that there is a significant gender gap in favor of women for students attending graduate school.  Women represent 58.5% of all graduate students in the US, meaning that there are now 141 women enrolled in graduate school for every 100 men.  In certain fields like Education (74.5% female), Health Sciences (77.9% female) and Public Administration (75.5%), women outnumber men by a factor of almost three or more.  By field of study, women enrolled in graduate school outnumber men in the same 7 out of the 11 graduate fields of study noted above, with females being a minority share of graduate students in only Business (44.8% female), Engineering (23.3% female), Math and Computer Science (29.1% female), and Physical Sciences (37.2% female).

MP: Here’s my prediction – the facts that: a) men are underrepresented in graduate school enrollment overall (100 men were enrolled in 2012 for every 141 women), b) men received fewer master’s (40.5% of the total) and doctoral degrees (47.8% of the total) than women in 2012, and c) men were underrepresented in 7 out of 11 graduate fields of study at both the master’s and doctoral levels last year will get no attention at all from the media, universities and anybody in the higher education industry.

Additionally, there will be no calls for government studies, or increased government funding to address the significant gender disparities in graduate schools, and nobody will refer to the gender graduate school enrollment and degree gaps favoring women as a problem or a “crisis.”  Further, neither President Obama nor Congress will address the gender graduate enrollment and degree gaps by invoking the Title IX gender-equity law, like they have threatened to do for the gender gap in some college math and science programs. And there won’t be any executive orders to address the huge gender disparity in graduate schools by creating a White House Council on Boys and Men like the executive order issued by President Obama in 2009 to create the “White House Council on Women and Girls.”  Finally, despite their stated commitment to “gender equity,” the hundreds of university women’s centers around the country are unlikely to show any concern about the significant gender inequities in graduate school enrollment and degrees, and universities will not be allocating funding to set up men’s centers or create graduate scholarships for men.

Bottom Line: If there is any attention about gender differences in the CGS annual report, it will likely be about the fact that women are a minority in 4 of the 11 fields of graduate study including engineering and computer science (a gender gap which some consider to be a “national crisis”), with calls for greater awareness of female under-representation in STEM graduate fields of study and careers (except for the STEM field of biology, where women are over-represented).  But don’t expect any concern about the fact that men have increasingly become the second sex in higher education.  The concern about gender imbalances will remain extremely selective, and will only focus on cases when women, not men, are underrepresented and in the minority.

15 thoughts on “Women earned majority of doctoral degrees in 2012 for 4th straight year, and outnumber men in grad school 141 to 100

  1. Until men organize as a grievance group with the Democrats, your prediction will be accurate.

    What this country really needs is a Handicapper General to ensure that there are no disparities by age, sex, race, IQ or any other imaginable division.

    • If this were a natural thing – I wouldn’t mind so much but the entire education system from kindergarten on has been regeared towards women. The boys instead of being their wild selves are being drugged into a stupor. The educational material has been changed to favor girl topics. There is an entire industry in preparing girls to go to college while ignoring men.

      Because of this it is a surprise that women are 41% more represented in grad school – when women outnumber men almost 50% as undergrads.

  2. Women are gaining doctorate degrees in valueless or low value fields, then wonder why they don’t make as much as men on average. I laugh in their face.

    • They actually make more…. but in the Public Sector.

      All such women will get paid $300K for some government job.

      Recall that Michelle Obama was paid $320K/year for a token position at a hospital because her husband was the US Senator from IL. When she left the job to go live in the whitehouse, the hospital never backfilled the position, indicating that the role was not needed for the operation of that hospital.

      A lot of these PhD women are going to be paid a LOT in the public sector, perhaps 5x as much as they could make in the private sector without government intervention on their behalf.

  3. A piece of this is the raising of the name of the degree in a number of health care fields. For example there did not used to be doctorates in nursing, nor physical therapy, today in physical therapy a Doctorate in Physical Therapy is the equivalent of the old Masters. (The Health care ratio is so skewed because the idea that allied health professions now need doctoral level credentials).
    So in some areas likely the professions women are more likely to enter, the degree requirements have gone up.

    • toads-

      a poll at the end of a barely coherent rant promoting patriarchy and sex war is going to be a poll of guys that live in their mom’s basements and dream of being “players” in “the game” and like to imagine that they are really alpha males being held down by women when, in fact, they are just omegas desperate to validate themselves.

      we could get the same results for “aliens are among us” or “al gore deserves his nobel prize ” if we put the poll at the end of the right content.

      there lots of reasons to oppose affirmative action and to call comments like bill’s out for being the nonsense that they are, but your continual attempts to take it to the flip side of patriarchy and female submission are just obvious attempts to paper over your own inadequacies by blaming others for your shortcomings.

      how anyone who is pro patriarchy can go after to morality of those who seek to advance another gender or race and not see that they are a complete hypocrite is just beyond me.

      you seek to dominate others but complain when they try to do likewise?

      wake up and smell what you are shoveling son.

      • I agree that a “poll” that elicits fewer than 7 thousand responses after more than a year isn’t very reliable.

        I would point out, however, that your comment is highly accusatory. It did not need to be phrased that way.

        The poll may not be good evidence, but a personal attack on the person citing the poll is not warranted.

        • cage-

          there’s a history here. trust me, it IS warranted. toads has loathsome views that are as despicable as they are hypocritical.

          by all means, read the article to which toads’ “poll” is attached. he crops up on thread after thread pushing the gender equivalent of white supremacy. do not take my word for it. please, read it yourself and some of the charming links like “patriarchy works” and make your own decision.

          i suspect that 10 minutes of reading will lead you to agree that what you term “personal attacks” are actually extremely generous descriptions.

          it’s pro patriarchy drivel with a side order of woman hating and fantasy about being a “player”.

          skip down to the 4 horsemen of male emancipation section:

          1. learning to lie and manipulate.

          2. porn

          3. moving to countries where women know their place

          and something incoherent about not wanting to give them money and or pay taxes.

          my comment is based on facts from toad’s own links.

          so, perhaps you ought to familiarize yourself with their content before making a judgement here.

          if someone liked to white power hate sites, you’d be perfect just in accusing them of bigotry.

          this is precisely the same.

          read the material on the site that carries that poll, then decide.

  4. No, it will not be reported and it will not be studied. In order to have classes of victims, one must also have a class of offenders. White males, unless they fall into a victim class, are the offenders. White males who are challenged in other capacities are simply out of luck.

  5. I realize this post is about gender, but I am saddened when I look at the data at the link. 100,000 people are enrolled in Arts and Humanities graduate programs, 130,000 in Social and Behavioral graduate programs. Why are so many bright young people spending so much time and money to learn knowledge they will not likely be able to employ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>