Economics, Taxes and Spending

Study: Is a US debt crisis calling from inside the house?

Credit: Federal Reserve

Credit: Federal Reserve

Something to keep in mind as Washington debates the sequester: US publicly held debt is roughly 74% of GDP. Gross debt, including money owed to other parts of the government such as Social Security trust funds, is 105% of GDP. Does either number suggest a tipping point is at hand, that the US debt situation is nearing crisis? One well known study puts the red line at 90%. Now another study, this one from economists David Greenlaw, James Hamilton, Peter Hooper, and Frederic Mishkin, concludes even lower levels of debt are risky:

Countries with high debt loads are vulnerable to an adverse feedback loop in which doubts by lenders lead to higher sovereign interest rates which in turn make the debt problems more severe. We analyze the recent experience of advanced economies using both econometric methods and case studies and conclude that countries with debt above 80% of GDP and persistent current-account deficits are vulnerable to a rapid fiscal deterioration as a result of these tipping-point dynamics. Such feedback is left out of current long-term U.S. budget projections and could make it much more difficult for the U.S. to maintain a sustainable budget course.

The study, just presented at a monetary policy conference in Manhattan, has already drawn a couple of critiques. Federal Reserve Governor Jerome Powell isn’t so alarmed, pointing out that unlike many nations that ran into debt troubles, the US borrows in its own currency. “There is almost certainly a level of debt at which the United States would be at risk of an interest rate spike. However, we should expect that level to be substantially above one identified based on the experience of smaller euro-zone nations.”

Eric Rosengren, president of the Boston Fed, clips the Greenlaw-Hamilton-Hooper-Mishkin model as too simple. Among the important variables it ignores are a) the financial strength of the banking sector, b) political stability, c) the level of unfunded pension liabilities to GDP, and d) demographics such as the age and education. Rosengren: “While this is not an exhaustive list of omitted variables, it does highlight that such a pared-down model may ignore important drivers of tipping points.”

So where is the tipping point? Who knows. Cross-country comparisons are always tricky, as Rosengren’s analysis suggests. And the fact that the US borrows in its own currency, which is also the world’s reserve currency, makes it unique in a critical way. But as Powell concludes, wherever the tipping point is, “we are clearly getting closer to it, and the costs of misestimating its location are enormous and one-sided. The benefits to long-term fiscal consolidation–conducted at the right pace, and without jeopardizing the near-term economic recovery–would be substantial.” A good start: Getting the 10-year debt forecast on a downward trajectory.

5 thoughts on “Study: Is a US debt crisis calling from inside the house?

  1. Presumably, we won’t know the genuine tipping piont for certain until we tip. That, of course, is too late. Is it enough to know that it is coming, and that we are closer today than we were yesterday?

  2. Federal Reserve Governor Jerome Powell isn’t so alarmed, pointing out that unlike many nations that ran into debt troubles, the US borrows in its own currency-.

    So what? Does Mr. Powell not understand that destroying one’s currency is not a way to prosperity? The fact that people like James take anything that Fed governors say seriously given their inability to see bubbles even as they are popping is somewhat puzzling.

  3. Our trading partners, and China and Japan in particular, work hard to keep the dollar strong against their currencies because a big translation hit would hurt their export industries. As a result, China keeps buying US Treasuries that yield negative real interest. And, no, they can’t say screw it without damaging their own economies.

  4. To address the blogger’s point, no, the internal debt is not a pressing issue. Taxpayers owe $2.7 trillion to the Social Security Administration, but we have 20 years to make good on it. The “entitlements” issue, setting aside Medicare, is more politics than problem (e.g. taxpayers owe retirees rather than the other way around.) If Congress required business to meet its unfunded pension liability in a single year, you’d be able to hear the corporate screams from Mexico City.
    To be clear I’d be happy to accept means testing or other cuts so long as the money goes to the real tax victims: the young workers for whom FICA is a Ponzi scheme.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>