Carpe Diem

The top 1% of US taxpayers pay almost as much in federal income taxes as the entire bottom 95%, and half of that bottom group paid no taxes at all in 2010

According to new IRS data, the 1.35 million taxpayers that represent the highest-earning one percent of the Americans who filed federal income tax returns in 2010 earned 18.9% of the total gross income and paid 37.4% of all federal income taxes paid in that year.  In contrast, the 128.3 million taxpayers in the bottom 95% of all U.S. taxpayers in 2010 earned 66.2% of gross income and that group paid 40.9% of all taxes paid. In other words, the top 1 percent (1.35 million) of American taxpayers paid almost as much federal income tax in 2010 ($354.8 billion) as the entire bottom 95% of American tax filers ($388.4 billion), see chart above. And it’s that group of top income earners (with income above $221,000 in 2010 to be in the top one percent), that Obama and the Democrats want to tax even more.

Further, there were more than 58 million Americans in 2010 who had tax returns with a zero or negative tax liability, so about half of the bottom 95% of American “taxpayers” paid nothing or got a tax refund.

With those data in mind, consider Nolan Finley’s column in the Detroit News comparing paying for milk and paying for taxes, based on an analysis a reader (corporate lawyer Jon Taub) provided:

If every U.S. taxpayer purchased a gallon of milk, each person would pay $2.49, and the total cost would be 140.5 million times $2.49 — or $349 million.

Now let’s assume the government treated milk like government services and determined its price the same way it determines tax rates. The pricing would change as follows:

When the bottom 40 percent of earners buy their milk, they won’t pay a dime for it. In fact, the government would give them $1 in reverse payments for every gallon of milk they purchase. The total cost of providing one gallon of milk to each person in this group would be $196.1 million.

The cost of providing milk to the remaining 60 percent of the taxpayers would be $209.9 million, bringing the total cost burden of all taxpayers’ milk to $406 million.

Under our existing tax rates, instead of paying $2.49 a gallon, the top 1 percent of earners would pay 38 percent of the total milk burden or $109.81 for a gallon of milk.

Nolan concludes:

Taub urges everyone to think about that example whenever they hear President Barack Obama talk about tax fairness, as they will incessantly over the next few weeks.

The current tax system is unfair, but not because the wealthy don’t pay enough.

It’s out of whack because it doesn’t acknowledge that the rich are paying more for their government milk than it’s worth so most others can pay less. And instead of saying thank you, we’re milking those cash cows dry.

185 thoughts on “The top 1% of US taxpayers pay almost as much in federal income taxes as the entire bottom 95%, and half of that bottom group paid no taxes at all in 2010

  1. Lots of fallacies in this. You could argue until your blue in the face about a lot of things, but some of the things taxes are designed to pay for is infrastructure. To use the milk analogy, it overlooks the folks who either can’t or don’t want to drink milk, and those who are drinking the milk have also been drinking the living hell out of it. How long does infrastructure last? Not forever. When you listen to your mantra makers, the Kochs want to eliminate all taxes, but how many fleets of various types have they been sending out to use and crumble such infrastructure? Now they want to complain that they have to help pay for it? Well… not just now, but for the last 3.5+ decades. They want to destroy the country, but you overlook all that and chomp at the bit at anything they feed as a talking point about what’s fair. These slimy bastards have wealth made off of their daddy’s fortune, which by the way, was made by industrializing the Soviet Union. Nevermind that they were a group that he despised. The almighty dollar (or ruble in this case) was too much of a temptation to not help your enemy.

    • This is simply stupid. If you are not going to argue the facts on their merits, then your opinions have no value. Say something useful like: companies who offshore jobs should pay higher taxes than those who create jobs here; or wealthy people who hire people (Bill Gates) should pay less than those who don’t (Tiger Woods). Take a read of Harrison Bergeron by Vonnegut if you want to see the future of this socialist nonsense (that is if you read).

    • Could this have something to do with the fact that the one percent is rapidly gaining in income while the bottom 99 percent is losing. More right wing clap trap to me. Get the wing nuts out of office

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>