Foreign and Defense Policy

Foreign policy and the GOP

Image Credit: Gage Skidmore (Flickr) (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Image Credit: Gage Skidmore (Flickr) (CC BY-SA 2.0)

I get it, this election is about the economy. I’ve said so too many times to link here. But the presidency isn’t only about the economy (or cars or handouts or special forces), and it’s time Mitt Romney figured out what – with all due credit – the maestros of the Democratic Party did: National security matters.

Once upon a time, natsec was such an obvious GOP advantage that most Dems wouldn’t even bother. Not so last night, and not so in this election. Barack Obama is as vulnerable as can be (even though he killed Osama with his bare hands while reading Burke) – he’s gutted defense, scooted from Iraq, is preparing to scoot from Afghanistan, abandoned Syria, headfaked a China policy, and allowed Iran to make more progress toward a nuclear weapon in his term than in the three decades before. And that’s just off the top of my head. But instead of making those liabilities into, er, liabilities, Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan have assumed the American people will just know that they’re going to be awesome leaders because they talk about stopping the apologies, resourcing defense, and restoring American global leadership. Give us some substance.

I’m stuttering over this one (I hear it’s a good technique), but, but… John Kerry was right. And so was everyone who parroted him. Yes, he’s a windsurfing, elitist, hyper-partisan who pandered to Syrian dictator Assad and has demeaned our troops in the past. But that doesn’t take away from the fact that we are at WAR. There are men and women who are fighting to keep us safe. They are the best, the bravest, the brightest, and we walk into our offices, our cinemas, our supermarkets, our schools, and our public squares because they make our feeling of safety real. Conservatives have always believed that our nation and the men and women who wear a uniform to protect it deserve everything we can give them — not least our gratitude.

Mitt Romney, Paul Ryan: Fix this.

Editor’s note: AEI’s Marc Thiessen responds to this post here.

2 thoughts on “Foreign policy and the GOP

  1. You are correct. I was sickened not to hear hardly anything about our boys at war. Frankly, its almost enough to make me abandon the Republicans, except that now there seems no where to go (Ron Paul? Not there yet….) R&R need to address this – this week.

    As for Afghanistan. Bring our boys home. I was very supportive of the push into Iraq. I’ve read the various reports on chemical weapons – I think that they were there, and I won’t be surprised if a bunch of nastiness shows up in Syria now that it is heading down the drain. I would have also supported staying in Iraq to keep stability – not keeping them there has decreased stability and has invited al qeada.

    But afghanistan? Afghanistan is the graveyard of empires. I remember hearing the stories about the brutalized Russians (partly with our help, since we supplied the weapons) and almost feeling sorry for them. Now we have the Pakis supporting the Taliban, who are barely civilized. Anyone remember that lovely young girl with the green eyes on the cover of National Geographic?
    She has lived an alright life, but has no rights, no ability to be anything other than what she is told. She is one of the lucky ones.

    We have spent ten years trying to give these folks a chance, and now they gun down our soldier in cold blood. Time to bring the boys home from Afghanistan. Use the drones if we have to. Make sure we have an intelligence network left behind. And make sure we don’t see any more Americans die in that hell hole trying to drag it kicking and screaming into the 19th century.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>