Foreign and Defense Policy

BREAKING: Obama attends his daily intelligence meeting 3 days in a row

White House Flickr stream

White House Flickr stream

After skipping his daily intelligence meeting for 8 days straight — both in the lead up to and immediately following the September 11 attacks on our diplomatic facilities in Egypt and Libya — it appears that last week’s criticism of the President Obama’s intelligence briefing habits has finally had an impact at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

For the third business day in a row, the president’s official public schedule lists “The President and the Vice President receive the Presidential Daily Brief.”

Think we got to him?

Check out the schedules here:

13 thoughts on “BREAKING: Obama attends his daily intelligence meeting 3 days in a row

  1. That’s weird. The people defending him on spotty PDB attendance – including some quarters of the Washington Post – have been arguing that there is no such thing anymore, that there never used to be but Bush didn’t like to read so he had them brief him instead, and that anyway President Obama’s method of simply reading his updates every day is more effective anyway.

    So why would he start getting in-person briefings now?

  2. Not an Obama fan, but he gets most of his briefings via his iPad or smartphone. In case you haven’t noticed, this is 2012 – not 1952.

  3. Unreported: He spends the entire PDB working out with a small red ball attached to a wooden paddle with a rubber string. Like The Guv in Blazing Saddles.

  4. Wow, he really IS committed to this whole “presidency” thing after all! Who knew. And all along all he needed was to be challenged. I guess he showed us.

    I bet sitting through those rigorous learnin’ sessions earned him three extra rounds of golf at the course of his choice PLUS another mini-vacation.

  5. It can’t be proven (unless someone leaks it). But I am guessing that there was a major, specific warning of a terrorist attach in Libya, maybe even specifically targeted at the ambassador. If so, then he is specifically responsible for the ambassadors death – especially if he actually didn’t really read the daily intelligence brief.

    But it gets worse than that. The White House and its sycophants have been bleating that this was all due to that ridiculous movie. Here’s something that hasn’t been asked.

    When the violence began peaking in Egypt, why weren’t the rest of the embassies immediately put on high alert? Its know that sometimes this Islamic childishness spreads.

    By not putting out an alert, it becomes obvious that this administration was asleep at the wheel – no, delate that. That implies they were driving somewhere. No, they had pulled off to that sleazy little bar and were getting themselves all drunk over their imagined successes, and weren’t actually driving anywhere. And when they did get on the road again, it was, as in most extreme intoxication cases, a disaster.

    That’s my theory. Gotta better one?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Also of Interest

  • A Benghazi bombshell

    The Obama administration wants to consign the Benghazi terrorist attack to the history books, but this week three State Department officials will tell Congress that the Obama administration’s version of history is false — and that the falsehoods it told the American people were willful and deliberate.

    read more >
  • Why did Eric Holder drop the ball on Miranda reform?

    Attorney General Eric Holder is defending the decision to read Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the surviving Boston Marathon bombing suspect, his Miranda warning, telling CNN that cutting off his questioning “was totally consistent with the laws that we have.”

    read more >
  • Is Boston only the beginning of a new kind of terror?

    In the wake of the Boston Bombing attack, it may now dawn on al-Qaeda leaders that a series of small-scale attacks like this can have the same impact as one spectacular mass casualty attack.

     

    read more >