Economics, Entitlements

Social Security: How bad a deal, and why?

8.13.12 Biggs Social Security

The AP report that today’s new retirees will be the first to collect less from Social Security than they paid in has gotten people talking—I’ve done no less than 15 radio interviews on the topic. Most people think the reason Social Security is a poor deal nowadays is that benefits have gotten less generous over time, but that’s not really the case. The real driver is that Social Security taxes today are a lot higher than in the past.

For instance, a person who retired in 1950 paid around 0.8 percent of his lifetime earnings into the program. The statutory tax rate was 2 percent, but the retiree had only paid in from 1935 (when Social Security started) until 1950.

A person retiring in 1970 paid an average lifetime rate of 3.6 percent, while by 1990 the average rate had risen to 8.0 percent.

But a person retiring today paid an average of 10.7 percent of his lifetime earnings into Social Security, even though the benefits offered by Social Security today are roughly the same as in the past.

So a person retiring today paid in roughly three times as much as a retiree in 1970 to get the same amount out. For future retirees, who will pay the current 12.4 percent tax rate or more over their full working lifetime, things look even worse.

Now, this may still be a good deal—who can say? But I would have been very surprised to hear AARP argue in 1970 that Social Security would still be a good deal at three times the price. Yet that’s more or less what we’re looking at today.

2 thoughts on “Social Security: How bad a deal, and why?

  1. No. What stinks about Social Security is that it is a Ponzi scheme – but one in which the government FORCES me to participate. To get ripped off by Madoff or Nadel, you had to decide to give them your money. The federal government just TAKES your money for social security.

    Look at the percentage of federal spending comprised of social security and medicare. It’s ridiculous.

    Social Security should be phased out starting immediately. Right now, it should be means-tested. The means-testing limits should increase in stringency inversely with age – so that younger Americans should expect to face more stringent means testing for receipt of benefits than older Americans. Americans currently younger than 35 should be ineligible for social security in their own old age. It should end. Same thing for medicare. Shut them both down.

    People can rely on themselves. The more they do so, the better off they will be as a general trend. If a person intends to retire in their old age, then let them prepare for it themselves.

  2. Social security SHOULD NOT be ran by the government. Social security was only meant to be a temporary assistance for the great depression. Then the American people became lazy and dependent on security was then not taken out, which is where the government went completely wrong. From then on president used social security benefits to help them through elections. The American people have been trapped in a vicious circle!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>