I know less than Charles Murray and Leon Kass about the greater philosophy of morality, though I like to think I am a moralist when it comes to foreign policy. But Charles and Leon, may I ask you both a question? If we are against the mix of public and private, the blurring of societal lines, why do we believe that the notion of duty encompasses a ritual (political) suicide in the form of resignation by someone like Mark Sanford? Don’t get me wrong, I disapprove. But I do privately. Publicly, I couldn’t care less. He is a good governor, a fiscal conservative, a fine leader of his state. He’s clearly going through some sort of crisis, and I don’t really care about that either. Should not the notion of duty, and the concomitant burden of honor, also be divided between the professional and the personal?
Wednesday, September 17, 2014
Highlights from AEI's Special Sites